The new law is going to try a lot of ways to cut health care spending, since there’s a lot of waste and that is part of the reason why health insurance is so ridiculously expensive. The book talks about these experiments in Chapter 14, “How They’ll Cut Costs.” But we’re already seeing how quickly the most promising ideas can get killed by political pressure.
The Boston Globe looks at what happened when Massachusetts political leaders proposed changing the way doctors and hospitals get paid (h/t Shots blog). Instead of getting a payment every time they do a test or procedure, they would get a single payment for each patient that would cover all of the patient’s care for a year. That’s called a “global payment,” and it is similar to some of the ideas that will be tried out under the new law so doctors and hospitals don’t give us more medical care than we need.
What happened, as you might have guessed, is that the idea got completely bogged down in political disagreements. People are arguing over how much freedom patients should still have to choose the doctors and hospitals they want, how much power a new board should have to set the payments, and how much money hospitals should get to help them improve their care. So the idea is off for the rest of this year.
It’s not a good sign. Massachusetts already blazed a trail for the rest of the nation by expanding health coverage with a system that’s something like the new law. But it never got its costs under control, and now its attempts to do that are not going well.
This may be the biggest long-term challenge of the new law. It will make a lot of changes to help people get health coverage, but if it doesn’t bring down health care spending as well, our coverage will just keep getting more and more expensive. The experiments in the coming years will have to find the right way to do that, without hurting patients or putting doctors and hospitals out of business. But it won’t help anybody if we keep overspending on health care just because no one could figure out how to fight through the political pressure.